ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P

    不同截面形态的空心抗滑桩支挡效果对比研究

    A comparative study of the retaining effect of hollow pile in different sections

    • 摘要: 为了研究矩形截面空心桩和圆形截面空心桩的支挡效果及破坏模式,文章利用压力盒、应变片、钢筋计等传感器装置,开展室内模型试验。研究表明:矩形截面空心桩和圆形截面空心桩桩身最大弯矩分布在滑面上下约5 cm处,分布范围约占桩体自由段长度的1/4~1/2;空心桩桩身集水孔的布置会导致桩体承载能力有所降低,交错布置集水孔时,承载力约降低10%,竖排直线布置承载力约降低25%;圆形截面空心桩破坏时表现为沿滑面受剪破坏,而矩形截面空心桩表现为受压破坏。结果显示矩形截面空心桩的承载能力和抗弯能力优于圆形截面空心桩,在空心抗滑桩设计中应加强桩底至滑面以上1/2范围内的结构配筋,空心桩集水孔宜采用交错布置。

       

      Abstract: Based on indoor model tests, the pressure box, strain gauge and reinforcement sensor are used to examine the retaining effect and failure mode of a rectangular hollow pile and a circular cross section hollow pile. The research results show that (1) the maximum bending moment of the rectangular hollow pile and the circular hollow pile occurs about 5 cm above and below the surface, with the distribution range of about 1/4 to 1/2 of the pile length of the free segment. It is suggested that the structural reinforcement in the 1/2 range above the pile bottom to the sliding surface should be strengthened in the design. (2) The bearing capacity and bending resistance of rectangular cross section hollow pile are better than that of circular cross section hollow pile. (3) The arrangement of the water hole will lead to the reduction of the bearing capacity of the pile, and water collecting holes should be arranged in the staggered arrangement. (4) The circular cross section hollow pile is subjected to shear failure along the sliding surface, while the rectangular hollow pile is subjected to compression failure.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回