考虑基质吸力作用的Newmark改进模型在地震滑坡风险评价中的应用

冯卫; 唐亚明; 赵法锁; 陈新建

doi:10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.05.20

考虑基质吸力作用的Newmark改进模型在地震滑坡风险评价中的应用

基金项目:

中国地质调查局地质调查项目（12120114035701；121201011000150018）

计量
- 文章访问数: 800
- HTML全文浏览量: 115
- PDF下载量: 584
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-11-15
- 修回日期: 2019-03-25

Application of Newmark improved model considering matrix suction in earthquake landslide risk assessment

FENGWei,

摘要

摘要: 传统的Newmark模型常对地下水位以上由负孔隙水压力提供的部分抗剪强度忽略不计，这对于滑动面的主要部分处在地下水位以下时较为合理，但对地下水位很深或考虑出现浅层滑动的坡体，其计算结果过于保守。因此，文章将Newmark累积位移模型扩展至非饱和土力学领域，在考虑基质吸力作用的基础上，改进了Newmark模型计算公式。分别利用Newmark传统模型和改进模型对甘肃礼县幅区域内的地震滑坡进行易发性分区，并在此基础上分别开展50年超越概率10%情况下的地震滑坡危险性分区和风险评价，最后利用ROC曲线对评价结果进行验证和比较。结果表明：改进模型所得易发区和危险区的计算结果明显优于传统模型计算结果；改进的模型所得风险区的计算结果虽然改进效果不明显，但仍优于传统模型计算结果。由于考虑基质吸力作用的Newmark改进模型充分发挥了基质吸力的贡献，使得计算结果更为合理，研究成果可为相关地区开展地震滑坡易发性分区、危险性分析和风险评价提供新的参考。
- 地震滑坡 /
- 危险性分区 /
- 易发性分区 /
- 风险评价 /
- Newmark模型 /
- 基质吸力
Abstract: The traditional Newmark model often neglects the partial shear strength provided by the negative pore water pressure above the groundwater level. This is reasonable for the main part of the sliding surface below the groundwater level. However, the calculation results are too conservative for slope with a deep groundwater level or considering shallow sliding. Therefore, the Newmark cumulative displacement model is extended to the field of unsaturated soil mechanics in this paper. Based on the consideration of matrix suction, the Newmark model calculation formula is improved. The Newmark traditional model and the improved Newmark model are used to classify the susceptibility zoning about the earthquake landslide of the Lixian county map of Gansu Province. On this basis,the hazard zoning and risk assessment of earthquake landslide under 10% probability in 50 years are carried out respectively. Finally, ROC curve is used to verify and compare the evaluation results. The results show that the calculated results of the susceptibility areas and the hazard areas obtained with the improved model are obviously better than those with the traditional model, and the calculated results of the risk areas obtained with the improved model are better than those with the traditional model although the improved results are not obvious. The improved Newmark model, which takes the effect of matric suction into account, gives full play to the contribution of matric suction and makes the calculation results more reasonable. The research results can provide a new reference for earthquake landslide susceptibility zoning, hazard analysis and risk assessment in relevant regions.
- earthquake landslide /
- hazard zoning /
- susceptibility zoning /
- risk assessment /
- Newmark model /
- matrix suction

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	［1］NEWMARK N M. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments［J］. Geotechnique, 1965,15:139-160.
[2]	［2］JIBSON R W. Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark’s sliding block analysis［J］. Transportation Research Record, 1993, 1411: 9-17.
[3]	［3］JIBSON R W，E L HARP, J A MICHAEL. A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps［J］. Engineering Geology, 2000, 58(3/4): 271-289.
[4]	［4］WILSON R C, D K KEEFER. Dynamic analysis of a slope failure from the 6 August 1979 Coyote lake, California, earthquake［J］. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1983, 73(3): 863-877.
[5]	［5］WILSON R C, D K KEEFER. Predicting area limits of earthquake induced landsliding［J］. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1985, 1360: 317-345.
[6]	［6］RATHJE E M, SAYGILI G. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the sliding displacement of slopes: scalar and vector approaches［J］. Journal of Geotechnical and Engineering, 2008, 134(6): 804-814.
[7]	［7］王涛, 吴树仁, 石菊松, 等. 基于简化Newmark 位移模型的区域地震滑坡危险性快速评估——以汶川Ms8.0级地震为例［J］. 工程地质学报, 2013, 21(1): 16-24. ［WANG T, WU S R, SHI J S, et al. Case study on rapid assessment of regional seismic landslide hazard based on simplified Newmark displacement model: wenchuan Ms 8.0 earthquake［J］. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2013, 21(1): 16-24. (in Chinese)］
[8]	［8］陈启国, 葛华, 周洪福. 利用Newmark 方法进行地震滑坡制图——以映秀研究区为例［J］. 中国煤炭地质, 2011, 23(11): 44-56. ［CHEN Q G, GE H, ZHOU H F. Mapping of seismic triggered landslide through Newmark method-an example from study area yingxiu［J］. Coal Geology of China, 2011, 23(11): 44-56. (in Chinese)］
[9]	［9］陈晓利, 袁仁茂, 庾露. Newmark方法在芦山地震诱发滑坡分布预测研究中的应用［J］. 地震地质, 2013, 35(3): 661-670. ［CHEN X L, YUAN R M, YU L. Applying the Newmark’s model to the assessment of earthquake-triggered landslides during the lushan earthquake［J］. Seismology and Geology, 2013, 35(3): 661-670. (in Chinese)］
[10]	［10］杨志华, 张永双, 郭长宝, 等. 基于Newmark 模型的尼泊尔Ms 8.1级地震滑坡危险性快速评估［J］. 地质力学学报, 2017, 23(1): 115-124. ［YANG Z H, ZHANG Y S, GUO C B, et al. Landslide hazard rapid assessment in the Ms 8.1 nepal earthquake-impacted area，based on Newmark model［J］. Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 23(1): 115-124. (in Chinese)］
[11]	［11］程小杰, 杨为民, 向灵芝, 等. 基于Newmark 模型的天水市北山地震黄土滑坡危险性评价［J］. 地质力学学报, 2017, 23(2): 296-305. ［CHENG X J, YANG W M, XIANG L Z, et al. Risk assessment of seismic loess landslide based on Newmark model in beishan, tianshui city［J］. Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 23(2): 296-305. (in Chinese)］
[12]	［12］FREDLUND D G, RAHARDJO H. Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils［M］. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1993.
[13]	［13］吴俊杰, 王成华, 李广信. 非饱和土基质吸力对边坡稳定的影响［J］. 岩土力学, 2004, 25(5): 732-744. ［WU J J, WANG C H, LI G X. Influence of matric suction in unsaturated soils on slope stability［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2004, 25(5): 732-744. (in Chinese)］
[14]	［14］李荣建, 于玉贞, 邓丽军, 等. 非饱和土边坡稳定分析方法探讨［J］. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(10): 2060-2064. ［LI R J, YU Y Z, DENG L J, et al. Discussion on stability analysis of unsaturated soil slopes［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(10): 2060-2064. (in Chinese)］
[15]	［15］崔溦, 杨建, 刘丽. 连续降雨作用下非饱和土边坡的稳定性分析［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2007，34(3): 55-58. ［CUI W, YANG J, LIU L. Analysis of continuous rainfall conditions on stability of unsaturated soil slope［J］. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2007，34(3): 55-58. (in Chinese)］
[16]	［16］李俊业, 唐红梅, 陈洪凯, 等. 考虑饱和-非饱和渗流作用的重庆奉节鹤峰乡场镇滑坡稳定性分析［J］. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2010, 21(4): 1-7. ［LI J Y, TANG H M, CHEN H K, et al. Stability analysis of Changzhen landslide in considering saturated and unsaturated seepage effects［J］. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control, 2010, 21(4): 1-7. (in Chinese)］
[17]	［17］周建烽, 王均星, 陈炜. 非饱和非稳定渗流作用下边坡稳定的有限元塑性极限分析下限法［J］. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(12): 2300-2305. ［ZHOU J F, WANG J X, CHEN W. Lower bound analysis of slope stability subjected to transient unsaturated seepage［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(12): 2300-2305. (in Chinese)］
[18]	［18］刘子振, 言志信. 降雨入渗非饱和黏土边坡稳定性的极限平衡条分法研究［J］. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(2): 350-356. ［LIU Z Z, YAN Z X. Limit equilibrium slice method for unsaturated clay slope under rainfall infiltration［J］. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(2): 350-356. (in Chinese)］
[19]	［19］王新刚, 谷天峰, 王家鼎. 基质吸力控制下的非饱和黄土三轴蠕变试验研究［J］. 水文地质工程地质, 2017, 44(4): 57-61. ［WANG X G, GU T F, WANG J D. Research on the triaxial creep test of unsaturated loess under the matric suction control［J］. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017, 44(4): 57-61. (in Chinese)］
[20]	［20］ROBERTO R. Seismically induced landslide displacements: a predictive model［J］. Engineering Geology, 2000, 58(3/4): 337-351.
[21]	［21］SWETS J A. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems［J］. Science, 1988, 240: 1285-1293.

施引文献(10)

期刊类型引用(2)

1.	吉日伍呷，田宏岭，韩继冲. 基于不同机器学习算法的地震滑坡易发性评价——以鲁甸地震为例. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版). 2022(02): 47-56 . 百度学术
2.	杨志华，郭长宝，吴瑞安，钟宁，任三绍. 青藏高原巴塘断裂带地震滑坡危险性预测研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2021(05): 91-101 . 本站查看