ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P
    马昕,孙德安,刘树佳. 软土地区某超深圆形基坑变形特性及流固耦合分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2024,51(0): 1-13. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202309064
    引用本文: 马昕,孙德安,刘树佳. 软土地区某超深圆形基坑变形特性及流固耦合分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2024,51(0): 1-13. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202309064
    MA Xin, SUN Dean, LIU Shujia. Deformation characteristics and fluid-solid coupled analysis of a super-deep circular foundation pit in soft soils[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(0): 1-13. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202309064
    Citation: MA Xin, SUN Dean, LIU Shujia. Deformation characteristics and fluid-solid coupled analysis of a super-deep circular foundation pit in soft soils[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(0): 1-13. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202309064

    软土地区某超深圆形基坑变形特性及流固耦合分析

    Deformation characteristics and fluid-solid coupled analysis of a super-deep circular foundation pit in soft soils

    • 摘要: 软土地区超深圆形基坑工程具有复杂性、危险性和稀缺性等特点,所以对其进行精确的模拟预测具有重要意义。以上海苏州河深隧工程中开挖深度56.3 m的超深圆形基坑为例,建立基于Biot固结理论的水土双向耦合有限元分析模型,结合实际监测数据研究了软土地区超深圆形基坑的受力与变形特性;探讨比较了双向耦合分析与工程中常用的仅考虑渗流场对土骨架作用的单向耦合分析在机理上的区别,以及两种分析计算结果与实际监测数据的差异。结果表明:圆形围护结构受大偏压荷载一侧比未受偏压荷载一侧的侧向位移增大64.7%,表现出明显的空间效应;双向耦合分析因为考虑了随时间的增加,水逐渐从孔隙排出,超孔隙水压力逐渐消散,并伴随着土体体积变化的过程,所以能够对土体以及围护结构的变形进行有效预测;对于围护结构最大侧向位移,单向与双向耦合分析的计算值与实测值的误差分别为42.35%和14.35%;关于最大环向轴力,单向与双向耦合分析的计算值与实测值的误差分别为14.30%和10.27%,双向耦合计算得到的基坑围护结构内力和变形的结果优于单向耦合计算。研究成果可为软土地区圆形超深基坑的设计和施工提供参考。

       

      Abstract: The characteristics of super-deep circular foundation pit project in soft soil area are complexity, dangers, and scarcity; it is of great significance to simulate and predict its deformation accurately. As to the super-deep circular pit with excavation depth of 56.3 m in the deep tunnel project of Suzhou River in Shanghai, a fluid-solid coupled finite element analysis model based on the Biot consolidation theory was established. The deformation and force characteristics of super-deep circular foundation pits in soft soil areas were investigated by combining the actual monitoring data. The difference in mechanism between the fluid-solid bidirectional coupling analysis (BCA) and the unidirectional coupling analysis (UCA) which is commonly used in engineering to consider the single effect of the seepage field on the soil skeleton, as well as the difference between the calculation results of the two analysis and the actual monitoring data were analyzed. The results show that the lateral displacement on the side of the circular retaining structure subjected to large bias load increases by 64.7% compared with that on the side not subjected to bias load, indicating an obvious spatial effect. The fluid-solid coupling analysis can predict the deformation of the soil and the retaining structure effectively because it considers the process that water is gradually discharged from the pore with time, and then the excess pore pressure is gradually dissipated with the change of the volume of the soil. For the maximum lateral displacement of the retaining structure, the errors between measured and calculated values of the UCA and BCA are 42.35% and 14.35%, respectively. Regarding the maximum circumferential axial force, the errors between the measured and calculated values for UCA and BCA are 14.30% and 10.27%, respectively. The results of foundation deformation and internal force obtained from the BCA are better than UCA. This study can provide the basic information for the design and construction of circular super-deep foundation pits in soft soil areas.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回