ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P

    焦作市缝山公园生态修复后的植被碳储量核算及价值估算

    Calculation and value estimation of vegetation carbon storage after ecological restoration in Fengshan Park, Jiaozuo City

    • 摘要: 与常规森林碳储量计算相比,矿山生态修复后的森林生态系统碳储量及其经济价值的计算更加注重不同修复措施的效果和影响。目前我国针对生态修复后不同修复措施下植被碳储量核算以及价值估算的研究较少。研究通过相对生长模型法计算样方树木生物量,结合含碳率数据求得单位面积碳储量,同时,利用国内外多个碳交易市场的碳价格均价对焦作市缝山公园生态修复植被碳储量价值进行估算。结果表明:(1)在物种多样性与植被覆盖度2 项生态效益指标方面,挂网喷播法、台阶法及鱼鳞坑法 3 种生态修复措施下的改善效果依次表现为:鱼鳞坑法>台阶法>挂网喷播法。(2)在碳储量方面,鱼鳞坑法下乔木层碳储量最大,为646.58 t;灌木层同样以鱼鳞坑法的碳储量最高,为22.58 t。单位面积平均碳储量价值方面,鱼鳞坑法最高,为2173.71元/hm2;挂网喷播法次之,为807.91元/hm2;台阶法最低,为1467.56元/hm2。通过样地调查、植物生物量和碳储量计算可知鱼鳞坑法在提高生物量和碳储量方面具有显著优势。(3)国内碳交易价格下,鱼鳞坑法的碳储量价值最高,为34301.14元;国际碳交易价格下,同样为鱼鳞坑法的价值最高,为13973.80元。以上结果表明鱼鳞坑法不仅在生态修复效果上表现出色,还具有较高的经济价值。矿山生态修复不仅可以重建被破坏的植被生态系统,还能产生较高的碳储量,从而支持“双碳”社会建设。

       

      Abstract: Quantifying carbon storage and its economic value following mine ecological restoration is essential for evaluating the effectiveness of restoration measures and their contribution to climate mitigation. However, comparative assessments of vegetation carbon storage and associated economic value under different restoration strategies remain limited in China. In this study, the relative growth model was used to calculate plant biomass. The biomass of all organs and whole trees in each plot was calculated according to the field survey data and the biomass model, and then multiplied by the measured carbon content to obtain the carbon storage per unit area of each plot. The average carbon price of multiple carbon trading markets was used to estimate the carbon storage value of the ecological restoration vegetation in the Fengshan Park. The results indicate that (1) the effects of the three restoration techniques on species diversity and vegetation coverage provided by ecological benefits were fish-scale pit, bench cut, and hanging net spray seeding. (2) The tree layer carbon storage of the fish scale pit method was the largest (646.58 tons); in the shrub layer, the carbon storage of the fish scale pit method is also the highest (22.58 tons). In terms of the average carbon storage value per unit area, the fish scale pit method is the highest (2173.71 yuan/hm2), followed by hanging net spray seeding (807.91 yuan/hm2) and bench cutting (1 467.56 yuan/hm2). The plant biomass and carbon storage were calculated by sample plot investigating method, and it was concluded that the fish-scale pit method had significant advantages in improving biomass and carbon storage. (3) Under the domestic carbon trading price, the carbon storage value of the fish scale pit method is the highest (34 301.14 yuan); under the international carbon trading price, the fish scale pit method has the highest value of 13 973.80 yuan. These results show that the fish-scale pit not only performs well in ecological restoration, but also has high economic value. Mine ecological restoration can not only reconstruct the damaged vegetation ecosystem, but also produce a large amount of carbon storage, thus supporting the construction of a dual-carbon society.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回