ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P
  • Included in Scopus
  • Included in DOAJ
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
  • Included in CSCD
Wechat
GUO Changbao, WANG Lei, LI Renjie, JI Feng, WANG Yang, YAN Xiaohai, LIU Gui. Engineering geology properties and creeping strength characteristics of the silty mudstone in Gongjue County in Tibet of China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(5): 54-64. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202107012
Citation: GUO Changbao, WANG Lei, LI Renjie, JI Feng, WANG Yang, YAN Xiaohai, LIU Gui. Engineering geology properties and creeping strength characteristics of the silty mudstone in Gongjue County in Tibet of China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021, 48(5): 54-64. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202107012

Engineering geology properties and creeping strength characteristics of the silty mudstone in Gongjue County in Tibet of China

More Information
  • Received Date: June 19, 2021
  • Revised Date: July 29, 2021
  • Available Online: August 29, 2021
  • Published Date: September 09, 2021
  • The Triassic silty mudstone is encountered in the Sichuan-Tibet Railway, when it passes through Gongjue County in Tibet of Chian, and the rock is prone to cause large deformation under the condition of high geo-stress. In this study, we carried out the triaxial rock compression and triaxial creep tests under different confining pressures. Combined with the PFC numerical simulation, we have also studied the creeping characteristics and long-term strength of the silty mudstone under different confining pressures. The results show that the rheology of the Gongjue silty mudstone is characterized by the Nishihara creep model. With the continuous increase of the confining pressure, under the conditions of the creep and conventional triaxial tests, the silty mudstone specimens all undergo transition from tensile-shear failure to single-shear failure. The angle between the shear fracture surface and the horizontal line gradually decreases, and the number of microcracks decreases. Compared with the conventional triaxial test, the creep test has a wider range of influence on the crush zone caused by tensile stress. Under the conditions of high confining pressure, the silty mudstone is more prone to rheology. The numerical simulation results show that when the confining pressure increases, the axial strain, lateral strain and volumetric strain will increase, while the number of microcracks decrease. There is a linear increasing relationship between the instantaneous elastic modulus and the viscoelastic coefficient with the confining pressure, the viscoelastic modulus has a logarithmic growth relationship with the confining pressure, and the viscoplastic coefficient has an exponential growth relationship with the confining pressure. Under long-term loading, the long-term strength phase of the rock is lower than the instantaneous strength.
  • [1]
    徐正宣, 张利国, 蒋良文, 等. 川藏铁路雅安至林芝段工程地质环境及主要工程地质问题[J]. 工程科学与技术,2021,53(3):29 − 42. [XU Zhengxuan, ZHANG Liguo, JIANG Liangwen, et al. Engineering Geological Environment and Main Engineering Geological Problems of Ya’an-Linzhi Section of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences,2021,53(3):29 − 42. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.15961/j.jsuese.202100224
    [2]
    郭长宝, 吴瑞安, 蒋良文, 等. 川藏铁路雅安—林芝段典型地质灾害与工程地质问题[J]. 现代地质,2021,35(1):1 − 17. [GUO Changbao, WU Rui’an, JIANG Liangwen, et al. Typical geohazards and engineering geological problems along the Ya’an-Linzhi section of the Sichuan-Tibet Railway, China[J]. Geoscience,2021,35(1):1 − 17. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [3]
    张永双, 郭长宝, 李向全, 等. 川藏铁路廊道关键水工环地质问题: 现状与发展方向[J/OL]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021-06-17 [2021-07-27]. https://doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104001

    ZHANG Yongshuang, GUO Changbao, LI Xiangquan, et al. Key problems on hydro-engineering-environmental geology along the Sichuan-Tibet Railway corridor: current status and development direction[J/OL]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2021-06-17[2021-07-27]. https://doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202104001. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [4]
    LU C F, CAI C X. Challenges and countermeasures for construction safety during the Sichuan-Tibet Railway project[J]. Engineering,2019,5(5):833 − 838. DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2019.06.007
    [5]
    王庆武, 巨能攀, 杜玲丽, 等. 深埋长大隧道岩爆预测与工程防治研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2016,43(6):88 − 94. [WANG Qingwu, JU Nengpan, DU Lingli, et al. Research on rockburst prediction and engineering measures of long and deep-lying tunnels[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology,2016,43(6):88 − 94. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [6]
    陈仕阔, 李涵睿, 周航, 等. 基于岩爆危险性评价的川藏铁路某深埋硬岩隧道方案比选研究[J/OL]. 水文地质工程地质, 2021-06-22 [2021-07-27]. https://doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202103099

    CHEN Shikuo, LI Hanrui, ZHOU Hang, et al. Route selection of deep lying and hard rock tunnel in Sichuan-Tibet Railway based on rockburst risk assessment[J/OL]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2021-06-22[2021-07-27]. https://doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202103099 (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [7]
    吕擎峰, 韩文峰. 金川岩体各向异性与巷道支护变形破坏关系探讨[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2000,19(2):149 − 152. [LYU Qingfeng, HAN Wenfeng. Relationship between anisotropy of Jinchuan rockmass and deformation and failure of adit[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2000,19(2):149 − 152. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2000.02.005
    [8]
    王成虎, 高桂云, 杨树新, 等. 基于中国西部构造应力分区的川藏铁路沿线地应力的状态分析与预估[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(11):2242 − 2253. [WANG Chenghu, GAO Guiyun, YANG Shuxin, et al. Analysis and prediction of stress fields of Sichuan-Tibet Railway area based on contemporary tectonic stress field zoning in Western China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(11):2242 − 2253. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [9]
    刘新喜, 李盛南, 周炎明, 等. 高应力泥质粉砂岩蠕变特性及长期强度研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(1):138 − 146. [LIU Xinxi, LI Shengnan, ZHOU Yanming, et al. Study on creep behavior and long-term strength of argillaceous siltstone under high stresses[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2020,39(1):138 − 146. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10]
    刘高, 张帆宇, 李新召, 等. 木寨岭隧道大变形特征及机理分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(增刊2):5521 − 5526. [LIU Gao, ZHANG Fanyu, LI Xinzhao, et al. Research on large deformation and its mechanism of muzhailing tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2005,24(Sup2):5521 − 5526. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [11]
    方星桦, 杨曾, 阳军生, 等. 高地应力隧道蚀变花岗岩地层围岩大变形特征及控制措施[J]. 中国铁道科学,2020,41(5):92 − 101. [FANG Xinghua, YANG Zeng, YANG Junsheng, et al. Large deformation characteristics and control measures of surrounding rock in altered granite stratum of high ground stress tunnel[J]. China Railway Science,2020,41(5):92 − 101. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2020.05.11
    [12]
    尹小涛, 葛修润, 李春光, 等. 加载速率对岩石材料力学行为的影响[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(增刊1):2610 − 2615. [YIN Xiaotao, GE Xiurun, LI Chunguang, et al. Influences of loading rates on mechanical behaviors of rock materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(Sup1):2610 − 2615. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [13]
    张连英, 张树娟, 茅献彪, 等. 加载速率对煤系泥岩脆-延性转变影响的试验研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报,2018,35(2):391 − 396. [ZHANG Lianying, ZHANG Shujuan, MAO Xianbiao, et al. Experimental research of influence of loading rate on brittle-ductile transition of mudstone in coal rock strata[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2018,35(2):391 − 396. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14]
    陈镜丞. 湿热作用下粉砂质泥岩的渗流、力学特性及裂隙演化规律研究[D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2019

    CHEN Jingcheng.Study on seepage, mechanical properties and fracture evolution of silty mudstone under hygrothermal action[D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Science & Technology, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract)]
    [15]
    范庆忠, 李术才, 高延法. 软岩三轴蠕变特性的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(7):1381 − 1385. [FAN Qingzhong, LI Shucai, GAO Yanfa. Experimental study on creep properties of soft rock under triaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(7):1381 − 1385. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.07.010
    [16]
    徐慧宁, 庞希斌, 徐进, 等. 粉砂质泥岩的三轴蠕变试验研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版),2012,44(1):69 − 74. [XU Huining, PANG Xibin, XU Jin, et al. Study on triaxial creep test of silty mudstone[J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition),2012,44(1):69 − 74. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [17]
    杨振伟, 金爱兵, 周喻, 等. 伯格斯模型参数调试与岩石蠕变特性颗粒流分析[J]. 岩土力学,2015,36(1):240 − 248. [YANG Zhenwei, JIN Aibing, ZHOU Yu, et al. Parametric analysis of Burgers model and creep properties of rock with particle flow code[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(1):240 − 248. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [18]
    徐平, 李云鹏, 丁秀丽, 等. FLAC3D粘弹性模型的二次开发及其应用[J]. 长江科学院院报,2004,21(2):10 − 13. [XU Ping, LI Yunpeng, DING Xiuli, et al. Secondary development and application of visco-elastic constitutive model in FLAC3D software[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2004,21(2):10 − 13. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2004.02.004
    [19]
    丛宇, 王在泉, 郑颖人, 等. 基于颗粒流原理的岩石类材料细观参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2015,37(6):1031 − 1040. [CONG Yu, WANG Zaiquan, ZHENG Yingren, et al. Experimental study on microscopic parameters of brittle materials based on particle flow theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2015,37(6):1031 − 1040. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201506009
    [20]
    王俊光, 杨鹏锦, 梁冰, 等. 基于颗粒流程序的不同加卸载条件下泥岩蠕变破裂规律研究[J]. 实验力学,2019,34(5):873 − 882. [WANG Junguang, YANG Pengjin, LIANG Bing, et al. Study on the creep fracture laws of mudstone under different loading and unloading conditions based on particle flow code[J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics,2019,34(5):873 − 882. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-18-214
    [21]
    孙钧. 岩石流变力学及其工程应用研究的若干进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(6):1081 − 1106. [SUN Jun. Rock rheological mechanics and its advance in engineering applications[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(6):1081 − 1106. (in Chinese with English abstract) DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.06.001
    [22]
    MOTTA G E, PINTO C L L. New constitutive equation for salt rock creep[J]. Rem: Revista Escola De Minas,2014,67(4):397 − 403. DOI: 10.1590/0370-44672014670165
    [23]
    PING C, WEN Y D, WANG Y X, et al. Study on nonlinear damage creep constitutive model for high-stress soft rock[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2016,75(10):1 − 8.
    [24]
    HU K F, FENG Q, LI H, et al. Study on creep characteristics and constitutive model for thalam rock mass with fracture in tunnel[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2018,36(2):827 − 834.
    [25]
    YANG L, LI Z D. Nonlinear variation parameters creep model of rock and parametric inversion[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2018,36(5):2985 − 2993. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-018-0517-8
    [26]
    ZHANG B W, HU H, YU W, et al. Timeliness of creep deformation in the whole visco-elasto-plastic process of surrounding rocks of the tunnel[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2019,37(2):1007 − 1014. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-018-0668-7
  • Related Articles

    [1]WEI Tongyao, YIN Yueping, GAO Yang, LI Bin, HE Kai, TANG Jungang, ZHANG Tiangui. Deformation mechanism of the Taping H1 landslide in Wushan County in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2020, 47(4): 73-81. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202003043
    [2]ZHOU Yanyi, WANG Xusheng. Numerical simulation of groundwater evaporation in the Badain Jaran Desert of China[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019, 46(5): 44-54. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.05.07
    [3]ZHANG Ke, LIU Xianghua, YANG Hongxuan, FAN Wenchen. Experimental and numerical simulation of the mechanical characteristics of rocks containing hole and flaw after grouting[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019, 46(1): 79-85, 110. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.01.11
    [4]WANG Xiao, CHEN Zhijian, XU Jinpeng, DUAN Xingping. Numerical simulation of deformation and failure process of atoppling-sliding rock slope with a quasi-lamellar structure[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2018, 45(1): 137-143. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2018.01.20
    [5]ZHANGZhi-pei, . Study on triaxial compression creep test and numerical simulation about mud rock in southern Shaanxi[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(1): 53-58.
    [6]LIZhong-jian, . Dewatering test of group holes of the Ordovician limestone and numerical simulation of the Nantun Coal Mine[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2010, 37(2): 16-20.
    [7]ZHAOBao-feng~(), . Application of intercepting underflow on groundwater exploitation based on numerical simulation[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2010, 37(1): 27-30.
    [8]ZHANGYing-qiu, . Test of discharging water from the Ordovician limestone and numerical simulation of the second and fourth mine sections of the Yangcun Coal Mine[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2009, 36(1): 65-68.
    [9]SHENYuan-yuan, . Research on disposal method of artifitial boundary condition in numerical simulation of groundwater flow[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2008, 35(6): 12-15.
    [10]MOYang-chun, . Numerical simulation analysis on surrounding rock deformation characteristic of tunnel with karst cave beside[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2008, 35(2): 30-34.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 石子健,陈稳,盛逸凡,徐光黎. 碎屑流滑坡变形及运动特征研究——以恩施市沙子坝滑坡为例. 水文地质工程地质. 2025(01): 149-158 . 本站查看
    2. 宋勇军,操警辉,程柯岩,杨慧敏,毕冉,张琨. 砂岩冻结/解冻过程蠕变特性研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2024(06): 93-103 . 本站查看
    3. 黄艳婷,郭永刚. 考虑降雨敏感度的泥石流危险性评价——以藏东南地区为例. 中国地质灾害与防治学报. 2023(01): 129-138 .
    4. 陈继彬,李雪梅,罗益斌,冯世清,王媛媛. 侏罗系中等风化泥岩地基承载力试验研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2023(02): 103-111 . 本站查看
    5. 张卫泽,王琳庆,郭文重,陈雷. 基于Weibull分布的红砂岩三轴蠕变试验及模型研究. 水文地质工程地质. 2023(04): 137-148 . 本站查看
    6. 赵越,李磊,闫晗,肖万山,苏艳军. 水化-冻融耦合作用下大理岩单轴蠕变力学特性. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版). 2023(04): 1195-1203 .
    7. 邓益,肖世国. 基于串联流变模型的锚拉力松弛分析方法. 水文地质工程地质. 2023(05): 68-79 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (263) PDF downloads (130) Cited by(13)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return