ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P
  • Included in Scopus
  • Included in DOAJ
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
  • Included in CSCD
Wechat
CAIHai-bing, . Classification method of deep rock mass based on FDAHP theory[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(6): 43-49.
Citation: CAIHai-bing, . Classification method of deep rock mass based on FDAHP theory[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(6): 43-49.

Classification method of deep rock mass based on FDAHP theory

More Information
  • Based on RMR system, joint space index is removed and insitu stress index is introduced into the classification method for considering deepbury status of rock mass. Hierarchical structure model of deep rock mass classification is constructed, in which the 5 assessment index is respectively the intact rock strength, rock mass integrity (RQD), rock mass joint conditions, groundwater conditions and insitu stress state. The weight of each index is determined by using Fuzzy Delphi Analytic Hierarchy Process method (FDAHP), and classification method of deep rock mass for coal mine based on FDAHP theory is presented. The proposed method and RMR system are applied to deep rock mass at depth of 600~1 000m in the Huainan mining area for a comparative analysis. The results show that rock mass at depth of 600~1 000m in Huainan are mostly threegrade or fourgrade rock mass. The value of the proposed method is less than the value of RMR system, and the maximum value difference is as high as 8 points.
  • Related Articles

    [1]HU Xuewen, LI Yun’an, FAN Zhigao. Stability evaluation of karst roof of pile foundation based on variable weight fuzzy comprehensive theory[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(6): 149-159. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202307035
    [2]WANG Jiazhu, BA Renji, GE Hua, TIE Yongbo, GAO Yanchao. Research on early-warning prediction model of critical slide of creep landslide based on the MACD index[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2022, 49(6): 133-140. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202110002
    [3]WANG Meihua, FAN Hongxi, ZHANG Ruolin. An analysis on the evaluation indexes of core journal and its improving effect on journal influence: a case study of Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2019, 46(3): 169-174. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2019.03.23
    [4]NI Tianxiang, YANG Qing, WANG Junhao, ZHAO Hui, JIN Huali, QIAO Ling. A new improvement of Nemero index method and its application[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2018, 45(2): 171-174. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2018.02.26
    [5]ZHANGYan-ling, . Division of landslide susceptibility based on weights of evidence model[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(2): 121-125.
    [6]XUFenqiang, . Statistic analysis on physical and mechanical indexes of the silty clay in the Hexi area of Nanjing[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(1): 65-65.
    [7]JIANGSi-min, . Application of Pareto strength index based on genetic algorithms to solving groundwater simulation-optimization models[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(1): 11-15.
    [8]LIUZhu, . Experimental research on the correlation of physical mechanics indexes of the turfy soil in the Jilin Area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2010, 37(4): 53-57.
    [9]JIAOXun, . A fuzzy method for groundwater quality evaluation introduced with weight of sample difference[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2010, 37(3): 6-11.
    [10]WANGJin-zhe, . Discussing foundation and principle on choosing evaluating index of groundwater function[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2008, 35(2): 76-81.

Catalog

    Article views (1408) PDF downloads (598) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return