ISSN 1000-3665 CN 11-2202/P
  • Included in Scopus
  • Included in DOAJ
  • Included in WJCI Report
  • Chinese Core Journals
  • The Key Magazine of China Technology
  • Included in CSCD
Wechat
MAYongzheng, . Using triaxial unloading tests to simulate the marine soil sampling process[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017, 44(1): 97-103.
Citation: MAYongzheng, . Using triaxial unloading tests to simulate the marine soil sampling process[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017, 44(1): 97-103.

Using triaxial unloading tests to simulate the marine soil sampling process

More Information
  • Received Date: October 17, 2016
  • Revised Date: November 09, 2016
  • To simulate the unloading sampling process of marine soil, laboratory triaxial tests are carried out with the marine soil from the seabed, and the advanced GDS triaxial test instrument is employed to remold the marine soil sample under the same initial pressure conditions as those of the field soil, thus the properties of marine soil, e.g., cell pressure vs soil volume change, are investigated. In general, the saturated soil sample volume change is approximately measured by the volume change of the back pressure controller; the correction of volume change due to compressibility of high-pressed water is also taken into consideration in this study. The test results with different test conditions, such as different loading and unloading cycles, as well as different unloading times, show that the high-pressure test results are not sensitive to these conditions. The unloading tests on different initial confining and pore pressures show that soil volume change increases with the initial pore pressures, etc. The general test features of the unloading sampling process are concluded in this study. The high-pressed soil sample swells slowly in the early unloading process, and then becomes steadily quicker, and the quickest in the end. The results of all the test conditions only differ from each other in the middle stage of the unloading process, not at the beginning or at the end stages, which is somewhat different from that of low-pressed soils.
  • [1]
    [1]MARCIAL D, DELAGE P, CUI Y J. On the high stress compression of bentonites [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2002,39(4):812-820.
    [2]
    [2]李文平,张志勇,孙如华,等. 深部粘土高压K0蠕变试验及其微观结构各向异性特点[J].岩土工程学报, 2006,28(10):1185-1190.

    [LI W P,ZHANG Z Y,SUN R H, et al. High pressure K0 creep experiment and the anisotropy of microstructure of deep buried clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006,28(10):1185-1190.(in Chinese)]
    [3]
    [3]李文平,孙如华,王维理,等. 深部土高压卸载变形结构性量化参数确定及本构模型[J]. 工程地质学报, 2007,15(3):384-390.

    [LI W P,SUN R H, WANG W L, et al. Constitutive model and structural parameter for unloading deformation of clay soils at high pressure from triaxial testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geology, 2007,15(3): 384-390. (in Chinese)]
    [4]
    [4]Jiang Ming-jing, Hongo T, Fukuda M, et al. Pre-failure behavior of deep-situated Osaka clay[J].China Ocean Engineering, 1998, 12(4): 453-465.
    [5]
    [5]商翔宇,郑秀忠,周国庆. 高压下饱和黏土B系数研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015,37(3):532-536.

    [SHANG X Y, ZHENG X Z, ZHOU G Q. Coefficient B of saturated clay under high pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 2015,37(3): 532-536. (in Chinese)]
    [6]
    [6]马金荣,秦勇,周国庆. 黏土的高压三轴剪切特性研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2008,37(2):176-179.

    [MA J R, QIN Y, ZHOU G Q. Research on Tri-Axial Shear Properties of Clay Under High Pressures[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2008,37(2):176-179. (in Chinese)]
    [7]
    [7]赵晓东,周国庆,王博. 深部重塑土高压应力路径试验研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2009,38(4):471-475.

    [ZHAO X D, ZHOU G Q, WANG B. Study of the Stress Paths Tests for the Deep Reconstituted Soils at High Pressure[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2009,38(4):471-475. (in Chinese)]
    [8]
    [8]刘涛,崔逢,张美鑫.深海海床孔隙水压力原位观测技术研究进展[J].水利学报,2015,46(增刊1):111-116.

    [LIU T,CUI F,ZHANG M X. Research progress of deep seabed pore pressure observation techniques in situ[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015,46(Sup 1):111-116. (in Chinese)]
    [9]
    [9]孔令伟, 郭爱国, 陈守义, 等. 浅层天然气井喷对地层的损伤影响与桩基工程危害分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2004, 24(4): 375-381.

    [KONG L W, GUO A G, CHEN S Y, et al. Influence of shallow natural gas blowout on stratum damage and hazard analysis of pile foundation[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2004, 24(4): 375-381. (in Chinese)]
    [10]
    [10]Zhang Rong-tang, Lunne T. Deepwater sample disturbance due to stress relief[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2003,25(3):356-360.
    [11]
    [11]李军霞, 王常明, 张先伟, 等. 两种滨海相软土固结特性的试验研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质,2009,36(5): 35-39.

    [LI J X, WANG C M, ZHANG X W, et al. Experimental study on consolidation properties of two marine soft soils[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2009, 36(5): 35-39. (in Chinese)]
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIANG Jinping, ZHANG Zhenduo, LI Xiaorui, JING Haoyong, HOU Gongyu, SU Zhandong, ZHANG Minglei, ZHANG Jianyong. Experimental study on unloading creep of sandstone under temperature-seepage coupling conditions[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(5): 105-113. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202311057
    [2]XIANG Qian, WANG Ke, WENG Lei, YOU Weijun, CHU Zhaofei, LI Zeyu. Experimental study of mechanical properties of highly-stressed rocks under true triaxial unloading conditions with different unloading directions[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(3): 80-89. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202304042
    [3]SUN Qiancheng, XU Xiao, FENG Guangliang, ZHOU Binghao, ZHAO Kaibing. Shear characteristics and mesoscopic damage mechanism of long time soaking red sandstone under loading and unloading conditions[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(2): 77-89. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.202303055
    [4]WANG Jun, ZHAO Jianjun, QU Shengjun, LIAO Yunjing, WANG Guo, FAN Qi. A study of the geological-mechanical response during large-scale excavation of high slope under unloading condition: exemplified by the right abutment of the Tibet Rumei Hydropower Station[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2018, 45(4): 37-44. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2018.04.06
    [5]SUN Shuqin, PEI Xiangjun, YUAN Guang, ZHANG Xiaochao, ZHAO Zheng. Influencing factors for unloading characteristics of saturated loess[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2018, 45(2): 59-63. DOI: 10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2018.02.09
    [6]FENGXiaodong, . An experimental study of cyclic loading of sandstone under different water contents[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017, 44(1): 110-115.
    [7]TANGLuo-sheng, . Research on the application of loadunload response ratio theory on time prediction of reservoir-type landslides[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2012, 39(6): 93-96.
    [8]CHENQiang, . A study of coefficient of permeability as a quantitative classification index for unloaded zones of rockmass[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(4): 48-53.
    [9]FANYong-bo, . Experiment research about mechanical characteristic of gneissic granite while confining pressure is unloaded[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2011, 38(3): 54-58.
    [10]WEIShao-wei, . Experimental studies on unloading deformation properties of soft clay in Binhai New Area[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2010, 37(5): 77-82.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 郭永春,闫圣龙,刘本华,张贵苹,尤安俊,刘家志. 考虑膨胀荷载的膨胀土基坑土压力的计算. 工程地质学报. 2025(02): 710-721 .
    2. 朱宝龙,任龙. 考虑温度影响的岩石三向膨胀力测量仪及其实验设计. 实验科学与技术. 2024(01): 9-15 .
    3. 白慧林,杨新春,冯文凯,刘峰辉,杨星. 残坡积粉质黏土遇水强度衰减机制及其稳定性评价模型优化. 工程勘察. 2024(08): 7-14 .
    4. 刘占兵,夏元友,殷源,程树范. 考虑湿胀软化效应的泥岩受荷膨胀模型. 武汉理工大学学报. 2024(07): 67-74 .
    5. 付钧福,杨超,李化云,代云昊,曹苏亚. 呈贡隧道膨胀土膨胀特性及应用型本构模型研究. 四川建筑. 2023(02): 286-289 .
    6. 杨东海,周子扬,莫雁冰,董方晏,陈治宇. 下枕膨胀地层大直径泥水盾构隧道注浆层的作用. 铁道建筑. 2022(09): 121-125 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (604) PDF downloads (419) Cited by(10)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return